(Both emails sent to Mayor F.Schorr and City Admin J.Lavisky 12-04-08/10-28,29-08)
12-04-08. I haven't gotten any reply from Chief Licata since before the very upsetting incident of 10-29-08 or after emailing the messsage below.Everything goes back to him and he controls everything.He had just basically made excuses for the S/Ws to me.Is he also putting his career on the line for the S/Ws?
The situation of,- there is an incident,I email the whole city, someone tells the S/Ws to behave for a while; there is an incident,I email the whole city,someone tells the S/Ws to behave for a while,over and over, -is not the solution.In a city that tries to espouse sophistication, the reality is, this is how things are done
Expensive competent legal work was done to solve this,to correct incompetent law enfor.which still controls the situation.The S/Ws are not going to modify their behavior on their own.They don't want to and they get too much protection and reinforcement.The Judge has to be approached if there is another way excluding reports to proceed with the Sett.Agree./Injunction Violations process,as there is no assistance available here, just thwarting and the continual problem. Thank you Gail Pfistner/Dullenkopf residence 3540 N.E.28 Ave.LHP. Excerpts possibly regrouped into general email. 12-04-08. Still no reply from Chief Licata on incidents and report requests for the violation process.

10-27-08.conversation with Chief Licata about John,fence,and Lori,cd technique.No real solutions.
10-28,29-08.email below sent. 10-29-08.Three patrol car incident.S/Ws"think"of somethinge else.
12-04-08.No further replies,Chief Licata,to date

10-,28,29-08 Sent.two recipients. Excerpts,excluding first paragraphs,regrouped to general email.
I do not think Chief Licata ever had the substance,desire,or intent to handle this situation.I 've been talking to him for over 3 yrs.Dealing with him is pretty much like the hostage/kidnap situation or a chess match as the extent of the harassment is directly related to police policy and that has been whoever decided to say whatever they wanted whenever they wanted.No recourse,protection,prevention,or solution.The S/Ws get excused and then it didn't happpen or it happened in the past.
I haven't gotten any response regarding the questions below or police reports which are necessary to proceed with the injunction violations,the only real solution.
This residency still cannot be used lin any normal way. This residency is not even leasable as the condition of the injunction and the S/Ws' and the city's lack of acknowledgement of it has to be explained.
The S/Ws cannot harass without law enfor.assistance,coverups,and protection,which they continually obtain for still inexplicable reasons,except blantant,belligerent misuse of power to work exclusively for the S/Ws,that already demonstrated by the fact they smashed the fence,trespassed,harassed and screamed everyone off the property,etc. for over five years,making an injunction necessary,which was ignored,benefitting the S/Ws.

Police reports may be the only deterent and way to stop this as the S/Ws don't want to get caught lying on them,as it is a Violation,which they have loudly discussed and argued on how to get around.This will not be a money making situation or even a money recouping situation.This would probably result in a lien.It,Violation procedure,is also a lot ot of time consuming work,but it's done anyway,along with at the same time putting up with all the harassment,and this residency still can't be used in any normal way.Lori was right back with that cd technique after Sat.night.They still think they are invincible.The procedure,described situation,below should also be considered.All this could have been avoided right when the injunction was instated.
I am not the least bit happy about what happened, Sat.10-11-08.I put up the website to stop that.I still believe Lori deliberately lied for effect.The S/Ws have had loud arguments and discussions over how not to get caught lying on a police report. Why not ask them things 'for a police report'? It might stop the lying and and more of this type of thing.
Now that the S/Ws have upped the harassment with a scarier version of "what Lori thinks",I really am worried about what Lori will "think" of next.
Standard letter.To Whom It may Concern:(names inserted)
Regarding the investigations:
If the Starrs/Watrases told you they never trespassed,and never trespassed and harassed after the Injunction, may I please have that on a police report?
If the Starrs/Watrases told you they never threw that 18 ft.piece of fence into this yard and left it there for weeks after the Injunction,may I please have that on a police report?
If the Starrs/Watrases told you they never lied to the police after the Injunction,may I please have that on a police report?
If the Starrs/Watrases told you that they did not keep repositioning that camera into this residency's windows and pool area after the Injunction,may I please have that on a police report?
If the Starrs/Watraes told you they never screamed at this residency or screamed threats at this residency after the Injunction,may I please have that on a police report?
If the Starrs/Watrases told you they never used made redundant or redundant cds,various volumes,after the Injunction,may I please have that on a police report?
If the Starrs/Watrases told you that they never counseled,etc.,see document pg.3,#4,others after the Injunction,may I please have that on a police report?
If these are not questions asked during the investigation,what was the investigation for,and what was asked?
11-29-08.Incident See emails.